Album Review: Counting Crows - Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings

Album Review: Counting Crows - <i>Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings</i>

I’m one of the millions-yes, a Counting Crows fan, but more importantly, a poor college student. When I lay the cash down for a new album, I’m not looking to gamble. And Adam Duritz and Co. have never betrayed the sacred trust between infallible band and impoverished music junkie-that is until their recent release Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings.

41cz1hqrh8l_aa240_.jpg

Being a Counting Crows fan has never been easy. (Remember that episode of Full House where DJ and Stephanie dig the Crows? That killed our credibility.) I’m always asked why I enjoy listening to a middle-aged man with dreadlocks mope and whine. Well, because he mopes and whines so brilliantly, and for the most part, we’re all heading in that direction anyway, save the dreadlocks.

Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings loosely fits into the category of “concept album,” the first half-dozen songs (Saturday Nights) representing dissolution and destruction and the final eight tracks (Sunday Mornings), according to Duritz, dealing with recovery and the process of rebuilding the lives we tear down. Both “sides” are contained on a single compact disc.

“1492,” a reworked barnburner that has resided on hard drives for years, jumpstarts the album with great promise and hints that the Crows might mope with a muscle missing since their stunning Recovering the Satelites. However, for every “1492″ or “Cowboys,” an equally appealing Duritz vent, there are forgettable rockers like “Insignificant” and “You Can’t Count on Me” that feel painfully forced.

The softer tracks come on the second side, but they offer only a few memorable moments. “When I Dream of Michelangelo” is a perfectly crafted melody for Duritz’s bashful pouting, and “On a Tuesday in Amsterdam Long Ago” exemplifies the beauty of minimalism, with Duritz’s naked storytelling voice accompanied only by Charlie Gillingham on piano. Nothing else is even in the same ballpark as these two.

Duritz can turn a phrase with the best of songwriters, which is one of the reasons this album is such a disappointment. He still has his same hang-ups, but you’d think six years between albums would have given him new or more interesting ways of writing about them. He beats the horses that Margery once dreamed of to death with choruses like “So if you see that movie star and me/If you see my picture in a magazine” on “Los Angeles” and “I don’t want to feel so different/But I don’t want to be insignificant” on “Insignificant.” The most painful line of the album for me is “But I would be lying/If I didn’t tell you the truth.” I’m still cringing from that one.

There is the glimmer of a solid album on Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings, but it’s buried deep beneath a pile of unrealized material. Fellow fans have implored me to consider that the band was deliberately going for a “raw” sound on this record. Hey, “raw” is great. I love “raw.” But the songwriting has to be there, and it just isn’t on the bulk of this album, and that’s a first for this talented group of musicians.

In the end, Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings leaves you longing for the weekend to end and the Crows to return to the studio for a better effort.

Lyrics: C-
Sound: B
Instrumentation: C
Vocals: B-
Overall: C+

Checkout:
“1492?
“When I Dream of Michelangelo”

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Share this story!: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati

3 Responses to “Album Review: Counting Crows - Saturday Nights & Sunday Mornings

  1. I have to agree. I spent all four years of high school with my ears glued to the Crows’ albums, and ALL I WANTED was to see them live, sooooo badly. But then my obsession with them slowly began to wither as I waited for them to put out some new music. Soon their music ended up at the back of my shelf as my musical tastes began to mature, though it came out once in a while when I woke up with one of their songs stuck in my head.
    So when I saw in a magazine that they were putting out a new album, I rushed right to the hypemachine to see if I could sample some of the new tracks. Upon first listen, I was unimpressed. But as a loyal fan, I gave it a couple more chances. When none of the tracks stuck I was so upset that I had an identity crisis- this man whose lyrics I had spent my whole life worshipping, was now so consumed with his own depression that he squeezed a painful album out, as it seems, just to put something out there. Honestly, I would have waited another TEN years if it meant that he could have kept this album in the studio to make it as phenomenal as all of their other albums. There’s no reason he can’t, he’s backed by an awesome band of musicians. He needs to stop clinging to his old sound- it was great the first time, but now it’s just being lazy. There’s only so long that you can ride your past accomplishments before it’s time to reclaim your pedastal.

  2. Better Than Ezra’s “Good” is a great song, so I’d have to disagree.

  3. Counting Crows have ALWAYS sucked. From day one. Right up there with the Gin Blossoms, Better Than Ezra, and the slightly more contemporary (but no less lame) Matchbox Twenty. These are not good bands. The real shock would have been if the new album was any good.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>