Album ReviewsHot

Bon Iver – Bon Iver

on June 22, 2011, 8:00am
Bon-Iver-Bon-Iver-Bon-Iver A-
Release Date
Label
Formats

Let’s start out with the negative points first, shall we? Then we’ll slowly work our way into the vast number of positive points there are to be made. That way, by the time you finish reading the review, you’ll have forgotten that I ever said a single ill word of Bon Iver, and you’ll go back to listening to Bon Iver on repeat like you’ve been doing for the past two-three weeks.

But first, a touch of back story: For Emma, Forever Ago is one of the strongest debuts released by any artist in the past five years. In fact, it may very well be the best. The beautiful layering of Justin Vernon’s falsetto, the simplicity of the melodies, and the story behind its conception were all key factors in the album’s rapid climb to massive popularity. Vernon made it virtually impossible not to like it. It was raw, it was earnest, and, most importantly, it centered on themes any human being who doesn’t have a gaping black hole where their heart should be could relate to. It’s already a staple in the indie canon.

All that in mind, Vernon set an incredibly high bar for himself. And as if all that weren’t enough, he then continued to raise that bar higher and higher in what had to have been the busiest off-season in indie folk/rock history. Not only did he tour For Emma relentlessly, but he released the Blood Bank EP to fairly positive results, starred in two collaborations (Volcano Choir and Gayngs) to universal critical acclaim, and, to top it all off, he became Kanye West’s right hand man on Ye’s tour-de-force album My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy.

By this point, it seemed Vernon could do no wrong, which, by extension, meant that his sophomore album would surely be an outright masterpiece. Unfortunately, this isn’t quite the case. And it’s not Vernon’s fault, or anyone else’s for that matter. It was simply the fact that the bar had been set to a height impossible for any musician, even one as capable as Justin Vernon, to reach.

But it’d be utter blasphemy to say he missed the mark by more than just a few tiny inches. Vernon came dangerously close to hitting absolute perfection, but was held back by one crucial element: sincerity. That’s not to say we think Vernon’s a liar. But part of what made Emma so fantastic was how unabashedly candid it was, and that sentiment is not matched on this album.

The scenery on Bon Iver’s previous LP was presented in such an innocent and incorruptible way, it was as if we had been granted the momentary rights to peel back Justin Vernon’s skull and peer in at his every thought and emotion. There was a sense of desperation on Emma that simply isn’t as present on Bon Iver. That selfsame desperation was what appealed to the masses; it struck a chord with everyone.

So, Vernon’s latest installment goes largely without that particular leg to stand on. But that in no way means it’s lacking on the whole. What it’s missing in raw emotion, it makes up for (almost entirely) in sheer musical prowess. Emma was based around one central idea musically and thematically: loss. Bon Iver’s elected to explore a number of ideas this time around, most visibly illustrated by the number of different geographical locations on the tracklist (“Perth”, “Hinnom, TX”, “Calgary”, etc.).

The number of locations listed is almost equivalent to the number of unique soundscapes Vernon and co. have created for this effort. No two tracks sound too similar, which is a good recipe for warranting multiple listens. It’s different shades of Bon Iver for the entirety of the album. The cause behind this particular idea is fairly easy to guess – this album was a group effort. Vernon added band members Mike Noyce, Sean Carey (aka S. Carey), and Matthew McCaughan after recording Emma, and the album is full of his ideas and talents alone. This time around it’s the collective brainchild of the four, plus additional guest artists here and there.

As such, we see such immense variation between tracks, from the nearing post-rock levels of opener “Perth”, to the more familiar acoustic Bon Iver sound of “Holocene”, all the way out to the cheesy-unless-done right sound of “Beth/Rest” that could easily be a cut straight from Bruce Springsteen’s savory cheese-fest of an album, Tunnel of Love.

One would assume that being stretched in so many sonic directions would take away from either musical integrity or cohesiveness, but it does neither. Every track is handled so expertly and with such care that it’s almost as if each track is its own album. There are half a dozen tracks on the album that could be this go-around’s “Skinny Love”. The title could go to the unbelievably catchy “Michicant”, the sprawling “Calgary”, or the billowing piano of “Wash.”, and it wouldn’t change a thing. Each track is done to complete perfection.

And though that might make it sound like the album is a scattered hodgepodge of tracks, we assure you this is not the case. In some inexplicable way, the 10 tracks that comprise Bon Iver are all incredibly interchangeable. Somehow, with all these different locations and all these different soundscapes, the album remains one substantial article of music.

And let’s be honest with one another. The album is a shoo-in for being a timeless great, no matter what we say. Vernon’s got the magic touch. But it’s lacking that original sense of urgency that flowed so freely in and out of For Emma, making it so genuine and so incredibly listenable. Perhaps we were hoping for another For Emma, Forever Ago, and that was our biggest mistake. Because what we got was another beast entirely: a beast almost as beautiful as its predecessor, only in a completely different way, which is, in a manner of speaking, the highest compliment we can pay Bon Iver.

Feature artwork by Cap Blackard.

10 comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Anonymous
June 29, 2011 at 10:05 pm

I’ve been trying so hard to embrace the work of Vernon, but to me there is no “there” there. The work strikes me as quasi-etherial and watered-down. In this genre I’ve been far more moved by Ben Gibbard and Jay Farrar’s “Big Sur” and John Grant’s “Queen of Denmark.” I feel like I should be part of Bon Iver’s target audience, and am frustrated that I’m unable to be. Where is my listening lacking as I approach these albums? I am asking this sincerely: what am I missing, and how can I change my approach?

pablou
July 6, 2011 at 6:30 pm

Get good headphones, listen to it without distractions, wait to make judgments till you let it sit and hear it a few times. If you want, read some positive reviews that talk about what people believe works most effectively and beautifully about this album. And if after all that, and you feel confident you’ve given it a shot, don’t worry. We’ve each got tastes, and thankfully the idea of a “target audience” is far from precise and riddled with exceptions.

Felipe Valle
June 28, 2011 at 3:12 am

i disagree with zatzbatz i havent heard the first album, just this one and i loved it and im planning to hear the first one, u dont have to be a bon iver fan to love it just a fan of music imho

zatzbatz
June 29, 2011 at 9:41 pm

Actually, what I was talking about was that people who didn’t like him the first time around are not going to be converted by this one. Now that you know him, I bet you really like the first one. Was what I was getting at. People discover new music all the time, and good for you. But I don’t see this album pushing him to greater heights of popularity or winning him any new fan base really.

zatzbatz
June 27, 2011 at 7:47 am

I think that what a truly successful sophmore album does is convert fans who were not convinced by the first album. This album does not do that. The only people who have been listening to this on repeat the past few weeks are people who already love Bon Iver.

kamoore63
June 22, 2011 at 7:16 pm

I agree with Kevin below. It’s hard to question sincerity, requires as it does an understanding of motivation. And I don’t know how he could have repeated the experience of that first album anyway. But other than that, this review is spot on. Too early to call it a classic but not too early to call it one of the best albums of the year. My review: http://www.kammentary.com/2011/06/first-impressions-bon-iver-by-bon-iver.html

Sam Sklar
June 22, 2011 at 2:42 pm

The absolute best review I’ve read of this album. 

bigwills
June 22, 2011 at 2:34 pm

I disagree. This is an outright masterpiece. He’s raised the bar, albeit a different bar, higher. Beth/Rest comes out of nowhere but what an incredible finish to the album. 

KJ
June 22, 2011 at 1:31 pm

Great review, amazing album.

Trevor
June 22, 2011 at 1:28 pm

Agreed. Emotional freshman albums are rarely followed by emotional sophomore albums, but rather a more polished feel that smooths out the rough edges of the first album.  That’s what we’ve received with Bon Iver, a beautifully seasoned work.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,551 other followers