Festival Review: CoS at Pitchfork Music Festival 2011

During Fleet Foxes’ headlining set on Saturday night, I looked up from the crowd to the jumbo-tron on the left and noticed the boom camera was high in the air shooting the audience. It was an endless sea of faces made orange by the stage’s flood light and a surprisingly powerful street-light that hung over the main stage. Eighteen thousand people watching Fleet Foxes — if you would have told me three years ago that this Seattle collective would be playing for 18,000 people I would have pushed you down a hill.

It’s a testament to the spirit of discovery that Pitchfork champions. Their passion for unearthing, promoting, and booking remarkable bands for Pitchfork Music Festival is always exciting, as many bands are new to the festival scene and aren’t used to thousands of people staring back at them. And during Fleet Foxes’ set especially, it became clear that one website’s passion for music has been transferred to the masses. Now that’s a feat.

Save for the controversy surrounding Odd Future’s performance (and the performance itself), this year turned out to be a very polite festival, and that’s not necessarily a good thing. Not to say there’s nothing to blog home about, but the bands that are still with myself, Adam Kivel, and Paul De Revere in the days after the festival are but Fleet Foxes, HEALTH, Deerhunter, TV on the Radio, Cold Cave, Woods who all seemed to be playing at their peak with definition, confidence, and clarity. They delivered some of the best sets of the weekend and, in hindsight, I wish there were more bands that were taking the next step up in the ambiguously tangible music ladder. Many of the bands on the bill were making nostalgia candy for all, in flux trying to carve out a new sound, or cutting their teeth much like the Fleet Foxes did three years ago.

There were plenty of acts we loved and very, very few we didn’t (see below), but there was an overall imbalance that lingers with me. Maybe last year’s lineup was too perfect, too timely to compare to this one. Maybe the music of 2011 is too unsettled to have found its vanguard. Maybe the PR fracas and the anarcho-punk of Odd Future’s set was the most relevant, most indelible memory of the weekend which can make for a hard pill to swallow. But the best thing about Pitchfork Music Festival is that there’s a needle for every groove — vegans get vegan gyros, record hounds get a bountiful record fair, interior decorators get 20 or so different graphic designers selling band posters at Flatstock, and everyone got three days of sun, weed, beer, friends, and over 30 of the best bands around.

-Jeremy D. Larson
Content Director

Feature photo by Meghan Brosnan.

TAGS

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

RELATED

  • Dan

    1. Fleet Foxes
    2. Cut Copy
    3. Odd Future
    4. TV on the Radio
    5. Deerhunter

    Note:  I was not there on Friday, so this list is sort of incomplete.

  • Brovak

    1. Fleet Foxes
    2. Cut Copy
    3.The Radio Dept.
    4. Tune-Yards
    5. Animal Collective 

  • vargo05

    Another clueless comment by CoS.  Ummmm…..Curren$y is not a “Young Money” rapper.  He hasn’t been with Lil’ Wayne’s shit label in years.  He was with Dame Dash for a while and recently signed with Warner Bros.  Come one guys.  If you’re gonna write an article, have a clue about what you’re writing.

    • Dan

      It seems like every time I see a comment by you, it’s a negative one.  Why don’t you stop reading the COS blog is you have such a problem with the writers.  You’re just beng a cynical asshole all the time.

      • vargo05

        Hey Dan, that seems like a pretty negative comment from you.  I make plenty of positive comments, when they are warranted.  However, when I read a music blog I expect the person writing it to know what they’re talking about.  I guess it would be OK if the people on CBS or NBC or Fox to say that Ghadafi is the leader of China.  Right?  I know this “just music”, but I expect the people who are reporting news, giving reviews, etc. to be knowledgable enough to report it accurately.  If they can’t do that, they shouldn’t be reporting it.  So, if me expecting somebody to do their job the right way is me being a cynical asshole, then so be it.

        • Dan

          I agree with you to an extent, but every media outlet makes mistakes.  Yes, news reporters (especially Fox News) exaagerate the truth or tell lies all the time.  They make up ideas just to make their points more effective or cut out parts of interviews that make them look bad or wrong.  There are websites dedicated to this type of thing, such as factcheck.org.  There are thousands of bands out there, and this is just a blog.  It wasn’t published in Rolling Stone or another large publication.  No offense to the COS guys because I read it every day, but COS is a blog (a well constructed one), but still a blog.  Comparing this info to CBS News is absurd.  If they spent the time required to research every single band they cover and find out every little detail, there would be no time to write anything.  The reason I love COS is that they are on top of everything, almost as soon as it happens.  I would rather have someone deliver my news 99% correct the same day than 100% correct days later.  All I’m saying is, it was such a small detail that really didn’t affect the story at all, so saying something in the comments section is unnecessary.  That’s all.

          • Stefan

            My problem with CoS’ penchant for inaccurate reporting, details, and in some cases total bullshit is that it leaves me skeptical about every reprt that follows. Especially their festival coverage. It’s unfair to paint each contributor with this brush, but clearly the accounatbility on what’s written is non-existent. A perfect example would be the Flaming Lips review from this year’s Sasquatch. What took place was something entirely worth writting home about. One of the biggest draws of the fest (the entire Soft Bulletin) was not completed! Never mind the “and more” part. There were nonsense rants, a major cake interuption, breakdowns… it was a mess. Or was it? The whole thing was also pretty surreal and singular. I loved the set and thought there was plenty to enjoy, cringe and laugh at in a weird satisfying way. I was downright excited to hear a credible music site’s take on the interesting affair (good or bad). What I got was just laughable. I am 100% confident the repoter didn’t see the whole set (no mention of any of the above, the only talk about Soft Bulletin is that they were playing it in its entirety??). So why write it like they did? Just say “I went to Yeasayer before they ended”, instead of looking like a clueless dummy who can’t spot the glarring abnormalties. What a wasted oppertunity, because it would have taken some guts and smarts to defend all the bonker let downs that only ended in the most perfect of let downs or just plain old personality to declare it unacceptable (ie. A VERY INTERESTING READ). But no, instead we get “Dudes the Flaming Lips brought all their festy tricks, Wayne yammered, but all in all a solid set”. Boooooooooooo! This is just one example.

            • JJ

              Stefan-

              The problem is that IMO I think most of these writers are guerrilla/freelance style reporters that go typically based on regions to certain fests. Some might get paid, but Alex and co. Usually only have 1 maybe 2 ppl at fests. Look at the set times. It’s obvious they don’t see all the bands in full bc they are working and have to try to get a word in of how it generally was from their perspective, whilst attempting to coherently appeal to a greater audience. The only timed that it seems sets are complete is when it’s a band in a venue. There’s just too much going on at a fest. I bet most of them (save the hyped up acts) see about 15-30 minutes of a set and go on. Your right, but it’s unrealistic to think that a couple ppl can attempt to cover a couple days of music without generalizing details. Too much to see/do

            • http://www.consequenceofsound.net Michael Roffman

              But they were at the set, so…

  • EARNEST

    1. Deerhunter 2. Animal Collective 3. Fleet Foxes 4. James Blake 5. Gang Gang Dance

    • http://twitter.com/nickriley24 Nick Riley

      1. HEALTH
      2. Dismemberment Plan
      3. Animal Collective
      4. Fleet Foxes
      5.tUnE-yArDs

  • http://twitter.com/nickriley24 Nick Riley

    HEALTH was the best show of the weekend, I agree. Fuckin amazing end to my weekend.

    As for OFWGKTA, how about if you are going to criticize them, then actually do it, stop hiding behind half-assed bullshit like, “oh they’re good and stuff, but they’re wasting their potential with gross lyrics.” Make a decision Adam.

    • JJ

      I think he means their good, but could be producing more positive uplifting music. I might be wrong, but the quote I cited came off that way. Odd future is more of a phenomenon than anything else. One Jimmy Fallon performance, and everybody loves them….you have to admit they have talent, but the angst comes from age and lack of maturity. Plus, their lyrical skills aren’t that great when put up against Rappers like immortal technique, pharaoh monche, etc…So in fairness to Adam, he respects them but they could be so much more

  • JJ

    “Do I believe that Tyler actually goes about ready to “smack a bitch,” rape, or murder? No. Do I believe that hearing this music will breed intolerace, hate, and violence? Entirely possible. Do these kids have some serious talent? Yes, definitely (their eccentric, minimal production, and quick flow were exciting). Are they wasting that talent on antagonistic, offensive stupidity? Yes, definitely. -Adam Kivel”

    I agree 100% – put them up against immortal technique and lets see who has better skills

    PS I will forever be jealous that you got to see gang gang dance!

    Great review guys